CTHOA
strives to provide the best qualified officials for all league games and the
best development opportunities for all officials. The cornerstone of this
strategy is CTHOA's evaluation program. This page explains how the program
works.
Every
CTHOA official has a rating, from 1 (lowest) to 6 (highest). Officials also
have a USA Hockey level, from 1 (lowest) through 4 (highest). These two
measures are related but not the same. Here is a comparison between the two.
|
USA Hockey Level
|
CTHOA Rating
|
Assigned by:
|
USA Hockey
|
CTHOA
|
Criteria:
|
Fees paid
Seniority
Rule knowledge (measured with written tests)
|
USA Hockey level
Performance during assignments (measured with formal evaluations)
|
Impact:
|
Not used directly for scheduling CTHOA games. May affect
ability to work tournaments and games outside of Austin/Central Texas.
|
Controls the levels, roles, and types of CTHOA games for
which you can be scheduled.
|
CTHOA Ratings
Your
CTHOA rating controls what assignments you are given for CTHOA games. The
minimum CTHOA ratings for our various leagues and levels are shown here. Your CTHOA rating
also controls what games are visible to you on the Available Games list.
Officials
who are new to CTHOA are typically assigned an initial rating of 1 (the
lowest), unless their officiating skills are already known to CTHOA's
schedulers, in which case an initial rating appropriate to their skills will be
estimated.
Each
CTHOA official receives a formal evaluation at least once per year (see
description below). Officials new to CTHOA will receive an evaluation as soon
as possible after they start working for CTHOA. These evaluations may result in
changes to your CTHOA rating (up or down). They are the only means by which
your CTHOA rating is changed.
However,
your CTHOA rating is not determined exclusively by the official who evaluates
your performance. Your evaluator will meet with the other evaluators, the
evaluation program coordinators, and the schedulers to decide when rating
changes are appropriate. This process ensures consistency in the ratings across
all of CTHOA's officials.
Note
also that there are limits to how fast your rating can be increased. In
general, an official must have worked at a particular rating in at least 20
games, over a span of at least 3 months, with at least one evaluation, before
the rating can be increased.
The following table shows the
criteria for each CTHOA rating.
Rating
|
Skating
|
Positioning & Mechanics
|
Rule Knowledge
|
Experience / Judgment / Awareness
|
On-Ice Presence & Communication
|
1
|
House
Squirt B or better; able to skate forwards and backwards in open ice with no
major flaws; learning forwards/backwards transitions; can stop and turn
either direction; learning basic cross-under [Adult C]
|
Learning
basic positioning and mechanics; some basic flaws still apparent; still
learning correct signals
|
Passed
USAH L1 open-book exam; learning common rules and penalty situations
(offside, icing, common penalties); will exhibit errors in rule application
for out-of-the-ordinary situations
|
Relatively
new to officiating; has done few or no games; beginning to develop experience
& judgment
|
Developing
basic presence and communication skills
|
2
|
House
Peewee B or better; can consistently execute control stop in either
direction, forward or backward; uses V-start consistently; developing balance
and control forwards and backwards; forward/backward transitions stay in
balance in open ice; able to turn and escape with enough open ice; solid
command of forward cross-under, developing backward cross-under [B2]
|
Solid
grasp of positioning and mechanics for both 2-man and 3-man systems;
generally in position with few minor errors; no major positioning errors;
knows correct signals, but may need to improve execution
|
Passed
USAH L1 open-book exam; completely comfortable with common rules and penalty
situations; developing broader knowledge of less-common situations; may have
errors in rule application in highly-unusual situations
|
Has
developed basic judgment for common situations; penalty selection as a
referee generally falls under penalty criteria
|
Beginning
to communicate effectively with players, coaches and captains in lower-level,
less-difficult games; as a linesman, generally provides some presence and
control during stoppages; may have some challenges in controlling difficult
or physical games
|
3
|
House
Bantam B or better; consistent balance and control in open ice, solid
forwards and backwards transitions at speed in open ice; good command of
forward and backward cross-under; can execute quick turns and escapes as
needed to achieve position [Adult B1]
|
Mechanics
and signal are automatic and crisp; Consistently in good position in
slower-paced games; developing skill in achieving and maintaining solid
positioning in faster-paced games
|
Passed
USAH L2 closed-book exam; solid rule knowledge across a broad set of
situations; makes very few errors in rule application, and only in the most
unusual of situations
|
Solid,
consistent penalty selection for common situations; beginning to develop good
game management skills for higher level games
|
Communicates
effectively with players & coaches at low- to mid-level games; beginning
to feel more at ease in controlling difficult or physical games; as a
linesman, provides consistent presence and control at stoppages
|
4
|
Travel
Bantam or better; solid balance and
control, forwards and backwards; consistent forward/backward transitions in
open ice; able to easily maneuver through light traffic; consistently
executes turns and escapes in tight spaces [Adult A, B1]
|
In good
position in fast-paced games; learning to establish solid position in
difficult situations (puck in close, net play, tight blue line play); reads
partners and provides backup coverage as needed in tight situations
|
Passed
USAH L2 closed-book exam; outstanding knowledge and application of rules and
situations in all situations
|
Effectively
uses consistent penalty selection to manage high level games; beginning to
develop advanced sense of game flow
|
Is
comfortable managing more difficult situations and games through
communications with players, coaches, and captains; as a linesman, provides a
strong physical presence when needed during stoppages
|
5
|
Travel
Midget AA or better; outstanding balance and control; completely seamless forward/backward
transitions; able to maneuver through moderately heavy traffic; able to
accelerate backwards from blue line with no forward start and beat play to
opposite line in fast-paced games [Adult AA,A]
|
Consistently
in very good position in fast-paced games; effective at establishing and
maintaining desired positioning as play moves close to official; consistently
supports partners as needed
|
Passed
USAH L3 closed-book exam; consistent application of rules in every situation;
in-depth understanding of unusual situations
|
Highly
effective in managing all different types of games (easy, physical, close,
important) through very consistent game management; strong sense of game flow
|
Is very
comfortable and confident in high-level games, regardless of the level of
difficulty; proactively communicates with players and coaches to head off
potential issues; as a linesman, manages approach and execution at stoppages
to match attitude of players and intensity of the game
|
6
|
Junior A
or better; flawless balance and control; able to maneuver through the
heaviest traffic; able to accelerate backwards through neutral zone at
highest levels of hockey
|
Always
in position in highest-level games; consistently works to get best angles on
play
|
Passed
USAH L3 closed-book exam; in-depth understand of not only rules but
"intent" of rules; detailed knowledge by section and rule number
|
Has
worked mostly at high levels of hockey; completely effective in recognizing
game flow, unusual situations arising; potential for escalating problems, and
proactively officiating to head off major issues
|
Is
completely confident at the highest-level of hockey; consistently
communicates with players and coaches to maintain a consistent game flow; is
very adept at using communication skills to ward off potential problems;
manages stoppages almost transparently, unless an altercation (or potential
altercation) is underway
|
Evaluations
The
evaluation coordinators will assign an evaluator to you. Every effort is made
to ensure that you have the same evaluator for all of your evaluations, so that
you can get feedback on your progress. Your evaluator will come to one of your
scheduled games and watch your performance. You will not be notified in
advance that your evaluation is in progress.
After
your game is over, your evaluator will meet with you and discuss your
performance. Your evaluator will show you written notes in each of the
following categories: Appearance, Skating, Positioning, Face-Offs, Signals,
Judgment, and Awareness. Finally, and most importantly, there will be one or
more areas for development identified, with a specific development plan for
each.
During
this discussion, you should take the time to ask your evaluator any questions
you may have about your performance and how to improve it. If you do not have
time for a full discussion, perhaps because of another game assignment, make
arrangements to speak with your evaluator at some other time, so that you can
get all of your questions answered.
Sometime
within a few days of your evaluation, your evaluator will type it into our web
site. You will receive email indicating that it is available. You can always
review your past evaluations by visiting here.
The
evaluators and schedulers meet approximately once a month, so any change to
your CTHOA rating resulting from your evaluation may not take effect for a few
weeks.
Officials
are scheduled for evaluations:
- at least once a year
- as soon as possible after a new
official starts with CTHOA
- when the official requests one
- when feedback from leagues or
teams suggests that one is needed
If you
wish to request an evaluation, you can do so by contacting
Stephanie Simon - banditrat@swbell.net
or
John Atkinson - the.senior.official@gmail.com
.Mentor
Program
Some
officials prefer more active assistance in their development. CTHOA has a
mentor program, and will try to assign a mentor to those officials who request
one. There are several things a mentor can do for you, depending on the amount
of consulting you desired:
- Your mentor will be open for
phone calls and emails from you whenever you have a game situation or an
officiating concern you want to discuss. This can be especially helpful
and reassuring after the occasional unsatisfactory game.
- Your mentor can join you on the
ice for one of your assigned games, and give you real-time feedback during
play and during stoppages. The only role your mentor serves is to give you
constructive feedback. After the game, your mentor will file an evaluation
report as described above.
If you
wish to be assigned a mentor, you can request it here.
Questions or Comments
If
you have questions about CTHOA ratings, evaluations, or mentors, or you have a
suggestion for improvement of CTHOA's development programs, please contact: